| ▲ | SR2Z 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Can you actually define what the kool-aid is here? Because AV companies are saying "look at this new product, it objectively drives better and safer than a human, you don't have to deal with a human driver, it works 24/7, and in our experience most people prefer it to driving." I have NEVER seen a single person accuse anyone of being a bad person for still preferring to drive a car manually. Not once, not even the usual one or two crazy people you can find to support almost any other crazy statement. Where is the kool-aid from the robotaxi side that's so visible? Keep in mind that "kool-aid" implies that something is factually incorrect. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BoingBoomTschak 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> I have NEVER seen a single person accuse anyone of being a bad person for still preferring to drive a car manually Just read further in this thread, will you? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | quadrifoliate 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> "look at this new product, it objectively drives better and safer than a human, you don't have to deal with a human driver, it works 24/7, and in our experience most people prefer it to driving." A lot of these are true about other things like pedestrian-friendly streets, bike lanes, and mass rail transit. The kool-aid is that the robotaxi people act like they are the first one to solve this problem. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||