| ▲ | cco 6 hours ago |
| Extend the Stem!! I have no idea why Apple has made AirPods harder to handle, impaired mic placement, and limited the battery capacity with shorter stems. The longer stems offered more room for battery, got the mic closer to your mouth, and were so much easier to handle, manipulate etc. Can't really fathom why they shortened the stem and made it harder for everyone, themselves and users alike. |
|
| ▲ | jandrewrogers 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I assume the long stem increases the likelihood it will be dislodged from the ear because it increases torque at the point of contact when moving. The first AirPods were much less secure in the ear than current ones. Reducing stem length may lower the risk of them falling out. The long stem may have been a necessary but suboptimal engineering tradeoff to get the first version out the door. A lot of design tweaks have gone into making AirPods less likely to fall out. |
| |
| ▲ | mft_ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This must be a personal preference based on ear anatomy. The first-gen Airpods fit my ears perfectly, and were secure. When I lost them and upgraded to the 2nd gen, I was initially upset - aside from the body being fatter (and so less comfortable in my ears) they were very insecure - I couldn't even walk around without them loosening and dislodging. I was on the point of returning them when I saw the advice online to 'twist' them into a different position. I now use them with the stalks horizontal, and they're secure. Still a touch less comfortable than the v1s, but easily tolerable. | |
| ▲ | spbaar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The first airprods were so loose in the ear I thought the entire world was playing a prank on me when I tried them out. | |
| ▲ | philistine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The long stems were literally the same length as on their wired headphones. They encased a bluetooth antenna and battery inside their existing design. |
|
|
| ▲ | afavour 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Personally I prefer it. Less chance of accidentally knocking them out. |
|
| ▲ | cj 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Aesthetics. Short stem looks sleeker. Form vs. function |
| |
| ▲ | cco 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do they? I don't think so. Makes them look stubby and more like a hearing assistive device (not particularly fashionable). They looked sleeker and more balanced with the longer stem and in the ear more like jewelry. | |
| ▲ | s3r3nity 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Or, you know, design trade-offs like every other hardware ever made. I don't want to feel like I'm wearing one of those customer support head mics. I'm ok with shorter stem, and never had a problem. | | |
| ▲ | throwup238 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Or, you know, design trade-offs like every other hardware ever made. Or different SKUs. Just saying. Not that hard for the most profitable trillion dollar company on the planet. | |
| ▲ | stackghost 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple are king of form over function. Have we already forgotten that hack Jony Ive and his fetish for removing usefulness in favor of a few mm of thinness? Or the stupid fucking Touch Bar keyboard? I still have a touch bar MacBook and the keyboard is unusable now. | | |
| ▲ | grvbck 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The touch bar was not a bad invention. Apple just neglected it and never gave it the software support it deserved. With some proper development it could have been great. | | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The touch bar was a terrible invention. Apple had no shortage of money to fix the software side, they just recognized that it wasn't a "Pro" feature. Consider the most basic usage of the touch bar, displaying function keys. The tactile feedback of a physical function row enables most people to touch-type the function keys from home row. For IDEs, NLE/DAW workflows, UNIX terminal setups and cross-platform software, the touch bar had nothing to offer but downsides. And even in apps that supported it, there was no unified mnemonic standard that enabled you to use the touch bar strip without looking away from the monitor and losing sight of your content. Apps that copied the content into the touch bar were even more hilariously cornered into bad UX, displaying a postage stamp-sized status for whatever you're working on. The common defense of the touch bar says it needed hardware reworks and greenfield HID architectures to succeed. But I think Apple realized it was a totally flawed concept, and iterated on it internally to the point that they realized it was a sunken cost fallacy. | | |
| ▲ | PlunderBunny 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’m sure I’m not the only programmer that developed a habit of resting my finger on the F5 key at a certain point in my workflow, and then had to unlearn it just because of the stupid touch-bar (Still using my 2019 Intel MBP with stupid touch-bar). |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | raverbashing 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Honestly the stems always looked kinda dorky to me |
|
|
| ▲ | ksec 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Extend the Stem!! Same thought as well. It doesn't have to be much bigger, but even 10% longer would be much more useful from mic placement and battery perspective. |
|
| ▲ | flyinglizard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Longer stem means bigger case. The case on the Pro is nice, the regular one not so much. |
| |
|
| ▲ | naravara 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I really miss the BeatsX headphones where it’s 2 earbuds attached to each other with a flexible cable that drapes over the back of your neck. It was nice to be able to take my headphones out without needing to hold them and they just fall over my shoulders like a necklace. Also means not having to keep track of a third item since there’s no charging case. And the whole thing is soft and flexible so you can put it more easily in your pocket without it bulging like the AirPods in a case do. I find the “true wireless” form factor finnicky and comically easy to lose and easy to drop. I don’t really see much utility in it either aside from the cool technology flex. If they’d put the modern audio quality and noise cancelling on the BeatsX (and the more neutral AirPods response curve) I’d be first in line. |
|
| ▲ | loloquwowndueo 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It’s Apple so the answer is clear: shorter stems look nicer. Functionality be damned. You’re holding it wrong my dude. Nobody wants to look like they have q-tips in their ears. |
| |
| ▲ | euroderf 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So fade the stem to dark grey already. | | | |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | longbrass 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The smaller the form factor, the closer they are to functional implants. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Also each device has to be identifiably different by at least some small margin, so the people who care about measuring worth/value based on the latest devices and similar trash can reject people based on what they "wear", pushing up device sales. |
|