| ▲ | cubefox 7 hours ago | |
This article is not up-to-date. There have been various benchmarks (some of which published and acknowledged by OpenAI, see the charts in this thread: https://xcancel.com/tomekkorbak/status/2095596839886274689) showing GPT-6 Astra is much less monitorable. The most recent third party benchmark I saw is showing a huge jump in capability for multi-hop reasoning without chain of thought: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FsCkkoGsNmPzFKRhg/gpt-6-astr... I don't think this is explained by the model simply being more capable and therefore achieving more per token: the usage of recurrent depth (Neuralese) is exactly predicting less CoT monitorability even at equal capability. | ||
| ▲ | ThunderBee 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I work on small scale recurrent transformer architectures. Better Multi hop reasoning is one of the most notable improvements of the architecture. The tricky part is figuring out a way to optimize the number of times you loop as it varies between tasks. Too few and you leave performance on the table too many and performance begins to drop. | ||