Remix.run Logo
dwedge 3 hours ago

I got way too annoyed at this before realising it was an optional game and I could just close the tab

alex_c 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Surprising how much of life this applies to when you really think about it!

cm11 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Avoiding disagreement is more ominous with people though.

dhosek 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

You’re absolutely right, but I need to go to the bathroom/get some coffee/take a smoke break/get back to this task now so we’ll have to discuss this further later.

btown 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Hacker News is the epitome of this! If you find yourself not enjoying your daily dose of "someone is wrong on the internet" (via the immortal https://xkcd.com/386/) as you find yourself crafting the perfect response, you can always close the tab!

SoftTalker 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I actually don't end up clicking the "reply" button on a good portion of the replies I start to write.

econ 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

As Ze Frank put it: I have a theory about this but it's a little bit to deep for the audience.

jodrellblank an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Don't worry, Reddit/Facebook/Gmail et al. still transmit that draft reply to their servers, store it against your profile, and train on it. Probably.

iririririr 21 minutes ago | parent [-]

and ironically, most of them don't even offer the draft feature! Facebook, tiktok, etc... they send your typed message, but if the app crashes or you close it, there's no draft anywhere you can find ;)

barbazoo an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I was gonna respond to you but actually decided not to.

jodrellblank an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

You can, but this is public and maybe you should post. If "you are what you repeatedly do" then we all collectively are what we all do.

If we each stop arguing with racists because we're each tired of it, then what we are is a society that lets racism go unopposed, a site with racist comments proliferating, a site where racists gather because they are able to be themselves, a site where future readers and AI training is learning that racism is popular, common, normal, and acceptable because everyone is accepting it.

It's a bit like democratic voting, your vote doesn't matter and cannot change things, but it's important that you vote because all of our votes do matter and can change things.

It's a bit like the quote "Dear Board, I don't want to belong to any club that would have me as a member. Sincerely yours, Groucho Marx.", I am upset and offended every time someone calls out my dumbass comments, but horrified at all the countless times nobody does. I'm exhalted and encouraged everytime someone upvotes or engages with my low effort quips[1], but thrown into a chasm of despair when nobody engages with comments I spent literal hours on[2]. I identify with nobody more closely than Colonel Cathcart, and I will be delighted if someone engages with my Catch 22 reference, but aghast that such a nontechnical reference gets engagment, distraught if nobody engages but delighted that perhaps HN standards are being held higher.

If not you, whom?

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49478355

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49586378 or https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49491182

fallingbananna 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's exactly how I treat reviewing AI generated PRs at work.

Except... the next day they are still there and I have to push myself a bit further through the wall of changes before closing the tab again.

RobKohr 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If it takes more than 20 min to review a pr, ask the dev to come on a call and explain what the code does.

pc86 an hour ago | parent [-]

It must be nice to work on such small-scale systems that you can reasonably expect PRs to be this quick.

zamadatix an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I don't know it has as much to do with scale of the system vs the general architecture. E.g. the system I primarily work with these days has millions of lines but most PRs are for a small changes which are well contained in scope by the overall architecture.

8note an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

reasonably you should already know what the code and project is supposed to do before they even start writing code, so you can get directional feedback in.

then you are maybe reviewing 1 out of 7 PRs that implement the agreed upon change

gedy an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

It's a cultural thing, but you can do incremental PRs towards a large goal. Giant PRs that are expected to be reviewed never really seemed worth it imho.