>Because they own the IP and they get to decide the terms of how it’s licensed.

how'd that work out for the rest of IP owners that had their stuff used as training data for use in model creation?

was the material they trained on produced in-house?

Use as training data has been tested in court multiple times and cleared.

I know some people want it to be a legal violation, but it’s not.

Also these are audio models, if you hadn’t noticed. The training sets for this type of work is very different than the corpus of scraped GitHub repos.

Was the material, I was trained, produced in-house?

Philosophical questions don't make sense if you use them to counter argue about something which is a legal issue.

> how'd that work out for the rest of IP owners that had their stuff used as training data for use in model creation? was the material they trained on produced in-house?

Not only did you pull a whataboutism but the whataboutism isn't even relevant to the topic of conversation lol.