| ▲ | simonw 4 hours ago | |||||||
> all requests to the Pro model will be routed to V4.1 Flash and billed at Flash's price If I'd carefully tested and optimized prompts against Pro I wouldn't be keen on this particular news. I feel like API model providers should lean towards not swapping out models on their paying customers, no matter how much "better" the new model is meant to be. | ||||||||
| ▲ | badatnames an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I imagine they're doing this due to capacity issues or somesuch. They can always relaunch Pro later, meanwhile a little ricered benchmaxxing of their existing flash model provides a temporary cover story. They certainly aren't silly enough to think this won't impact existing Pro users </paranoia> | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | satory 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
[flagged] | ||||||||
| ▲ | tjwebbnorfolk 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Sure, but if a company decided to place a remote chinese hedge fund's API at the center of a critical business workflow, this is a lesson better learned sooner rather than later. | ||||||||
| ||||||||