Corporations are more accountable than government agencies. A government agency can switch vendors or you can drag their CEOs in front of Congress. Try that with some internal bureaucrat in an agency you've never heard of.

▲

ceejayoz 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Try that with some internal bureaucrat in an agency you've never heard of.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/testimony-of-anthony-f...

How many Americans had heard of internal bureaucrat Anthony Fauci and NIAID before 2020?

▲

bko 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I doubt the president of the United States would be so quick to grant a full pardon to the Flock CEO for any past (or future) crimes committed.

Thanks for proving my point.

	▲	ceejayoz 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Do you genuinely think this is the only case of a government bureaucrat being called to testify before Congress? The current President would be happy to give Flock's CEO a pardon, if the price is right. (For example: https://www.newsweek.com/ceo-pardoned-by-donald-trump-arrest...)

▲

harimau777 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Leaders of departments (i.e. the government equivalent of a CEO) are dragged in front of congress all the time.

The government at least has a theoretical obligation to promote the public good. It isn't much but it's better than corporations whose only obligation is the shareholders.

The government is also subject to safeguards like freedom of infermation requests which level the playingfield somewhat.

I'm not saying that the government is good. I'm just saying that corporations are much worse.

▲

Lord-Jobo 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not even remotely true, Idk how you can say this with a straight face after all we have seen in Trump 1 and Trump 2.

Elected officials are basically the CEOs of each of these agencies, they have massive unilateral control and, apparently, can simply choose to unmake the agency at any point.

Except unlike CEOs, they require regular voter approval or they get punted out. If they make a stink the public hates the next president can easily axe their ass. That alone is infinitely better; how many of these horrible companies have 10-20 year CEOs pushing all this shit?

>drag their CEO into congress.

So they can lie and stick their tongue out for days, or just not show up? There is never any consequence for this, congress is functionally toothless. Only the courts and the executive can actually use punitive action.

The fact that there is an avenue of redress at all for public officials makes them so much more accountable than any corporation. Which is exactly why corporations spend so much money influencing public election and congress, they need to subvert the only system than can keep them in check.