you're as sure of what you say as wrong about it.

Note that your reply has exactly 0 value for anyone who doesn’t already know where and how the parent poster is wrong.

The same could be said of your post.

OpenAI (claim to) show the existence of *a* finite time singularity. It could stimulate more research in PDE solving, and maybe physics, but it has zero impact on practical applications, that I can see. The Millenium problems were chosen based on hardness not practical relevance.

If that were true you could explain it. There are lots of solvers for navier stokes simulations and they do a good job.

which part is wrong?

> For any practical application, numerical solvers for Navier-Stokes already exist and do a good job.

or

> This proof is just checking the boxes for mathematicians.