| ▲ | pu_pe 2 hours ago | |||||||
I feel that people should take these kinds of warnings more seriously. This guy had skin in the game and decided to quit, when he could be earning millions instead. It's very different than Sam Altman peddling some narrative. These people are the ones with access to the best models on the planet, and with info about how careless governance issues are being handled. That's a pretty privileged place at the table, and a very profitable one too. If you think this is a PR stunt, is there any warning that you actually believe? If an AI researcher does want to come forward with a dire warning for humanity, what path should that person take? | ||||||||
| ▲ | soshajks an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> This guy had skin in the game and decided to quit, when he could be earning millions instead We have no idea why he was quitting nor what the terms were. Sam Altman is exactly the type of person (as he’s proven in the past) to pay millions for this type of PR. If the government shuts down the labs and makes it illegal (as in men with guns will come kill you) to do any kind of LLM research I will get worried. As is, this appears to be another attempt at garnering support for the kind of regulatory capture they need to remain profitable by artificially choking out competitors. If these labs were really sitting on nuclear weapons, the response would be very different. Instead, we see things like Chuck Schumer’s unqualified daughter hired by Anthropic. They show all the signs of regular tech cronyism. Excited to see the next slack integration they launch, though. | ||||||||
| ||||||||