| ▲ | danbruc 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This assumes you are not trying to prevent Stockfish from wining. I can do many things from using chess engines myself to just smashing the computer that can or will lead to other outcomes than Stockfish beating me. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | johnthewise 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, stockfish is confined to moves within a chess game so you can stop playing the game. Can we say the same thing about the agents? Current, probably. But doesnt it look like everyone is spending all their effort integrating&connecting them everywhere, so they are not confined & do more on behalf of us? It's easy to imagine a scenario where we would just shut down a very intelligent agent cluster. Is it hard to imagine though the same agent can have also access to that to prevent us from doing it? this defense would be more plausible if we weren't racing to give them every tool&act. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | number6 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
And in terms of AGI it is, that the AI can't survive without humans, and if we decide to quit the game than its over for the AGI; we will happily regress in a techno-barbarian feudal state and salvage solar panels and trade copper wires while still reproducing and carring on. We are playing a whole different game here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||