|
| ▲ | FinnKuhn 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| In the UK overall, 64% of the population support police use of facial recognition technology to some degree and only 11% were opposed to its use [1]. The survey also looks at support for different szenarios, but overall many generally did not oppose it, while in the US 47% oppose the use of flock cameras [2]. [1] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-...
[2] https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/florida-bans-highwa... |
| |
| ▲ | bko 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | The Flock stat is interesting because 46% of Americans believe widespread use of facial recognition would be a good thing (27% unsure). Maybe people oppose Flock because it's not going far enough! Or maybe there is a coordinated campaign against a license plate reader for some weird reason https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/public-more-... | | |
| ▲ | FinnKuhn 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | My guess would be that opinions just changed since 2022 AND that support for flock might differ from general support. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | venzaspa 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No, it arrests several thousands of people every year for breaches of the communications act(s) - this could be for online harassment, stalking or trying to defraud people over Facebook messenger. It's the equivalent of 'wire fraud' in the US. |
| |
| ▲ | oklahomasports 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | They are arresting them for social media posts. You are lying | | |
| ▲ | Peanuts99 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Have you got any proof that anyone has been arrested specifically for a social media post? The most common case is Lucy Connolly, who was arrested for inciting racial hatred and pleaded guilty to the crime which carries a prison sentence. Or are you just a random non UK citizen who has been reading disinformation on social media? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | brookst 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Source for “a few thousand”? |
