| ▲ | _bobm an hour ago | |
People are focused on the drama but the problem showing is the data. This is the elephant in the room and I am surprised that openai can be that stupid with it. How can openai do this, what is being claimed, at the scale of their entire userbase? If they do this only for particular sessions then how do they sieve through sessions for the good stuff? How are sessions stored, how are they processed, how much storage and how much compute is used in these pipelines, how economical is it, how fast are the requirements on the storage on the compute growing as userbase grows and generated data grows. All these questions are far more pertinent than the navier-stokes, but i can only imagine all at openai doubling down on this "very important" mathematical milestone. | ||
| ▲ | jonathanstrange 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
It seems completely trivial to feed sessions to their own LLM and ask it to look for various things in them, from detecting problematic use cases to finding interesting mathematical work. | ||