Funny how people writing such things are also at the forefront of accusing LLM companies of stealing big time. Because of copyright violations.

So, which one is it?

▲

etiennebausson an hour ago | parent [-]

Both, it should be brought down, but it should be the same rule for everyone.

Big Tech doesn't get to ignore copyright law just because they have deeper pockets.

▲

teiferer an hour ago | parent [-]

> it should be the same rule for everyone

I don't think that's going to suffice.

Neither for the people arguing the original point who want protection for what they are doing but don't want protection for the big players who just make big bucks and "shut everybody down whom they don't like".

Nor from a philosophical big picture POV. The little innovator needs protections. The big capitalist less so. It's why labor laws are more strict with bigger corps than small shops. And why higher incomes pay more taxes. (Well that's the idea. That they find ways to circumvent the idea is a different story.)

	▲	izacus 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You keep making up strwamen and positions that don't exist. Maybe mock something people have actually said.