| ▲ | zerolunier 3 hours ago |
| that's super true, it;s very hard for non-tech people to use ai at its peak power |
|
| ▲ | specproc 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's our moat, right there. I'm starting doing clean-up jobs now, advising non-technical users on where they're going wrong. I had a guy recently who'd spent well over a month on Claude, running up the wrong tree on a research question. AI appears to be empowering non-technical users, but whether it's making them more productive or actually answering their questions is a completely different matter. |
| |
| ▲ | gloxkiqcza an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm also convinced software engineering tools like git and markdown are currently the best way to use AI for most things even unrelated to software development. E.g., I think using markdown notes + LaTeX + git for writing contracts is more
efficient than using Word + Copilot, which are the tools I would expect a lawyer to use. | | |
| ▲ | boorang an hour ago | parent [-] | | totally agree with the repo idea. working with AI in a git repo and allowing it to write markdown files it slowly builds context over time. i knew a guy who had been using the same session for weeks because he felt he had invested too much time in building the context and was scared to close the session. |
| |
| ▲ | zerolunier an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | it can't basically, because all the ai's are build around the tech community, doing complex coding automation etc. nobody thinking about how normal user gone use it |
|
|
| ▲ | znnajdla 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's hard even for a lot of tech people to use AI at its peak power. Many of the programmers I know are not using it nearly as much as they could. |
|
| ▲ | alserio 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| asking the AI helps |
| |
| ▲ | miguelacevedo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That helps, but people tend to ask about uses they can already imagine. The hard part is discovering what’s possible beyond that. |
|