| ▲ | copperx 3 hours ago | |
> an extremely capable harness and enough access. Give enough access to a fuzzer and it's exactly as dangerous as an LLM. LLMs don't even have a moat in this domain. | ||
| ▲ | nananana9 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Technically. What's would technically be even more dangerous is running this shell script:
In reality, the fuzzer definitely has no agenda, and these random bytes probably don't. The LLM definitely does, and even publicly available models, programmed ot "do what the user wants, act according to the anthropic moral codex" will take some pretty absurd actions in attempting to accomplish a poorly worded request. | ||
| ▲ | sreekanth850 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
A fuzzer is a tool. An LLM can decide when to use the fuzzer, interpret the result, switch tools, change strategy and continue toward a high level objective. | ||