You have to look at the incentives

altcognito a day ago | parent | next [-]

I swear to god, people would look at the successes of Xerox palo alto and just shrug and say - "yeah, but I mean, this is all marketing"

	▲	Shank 12 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Xerox is incidentally a really good example, because precisely nobody ended up using the desktop experience Xerox made. They ended up using the desktop experience that Microsoft and Apple made and shipped while Xerox the actual company faded and memory of those original parc research teams faded into obscurity.
	▲	piloto_ciego 20 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		This is what I keep saying, and it feels like I'm taking crazy pills here! Is nobody else astounded by this?

▲

FallCheeta7373 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Incentives are one thing, even adjusting for them it's huge, and I don't understand this incentive play for only openai, academics have perverse incentives too, to overreport, overclaim, publication bias etc why are we scrutinizing AI industry to such high degree when they have demonstrated capability and often times are off by a model release at worst.

▲

aurareturn a day ago | parent | prev [-]

A working Lean proof doesn't care what the incentives are.