| ▲ | bluegatty 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This is the most normal thing, and this is the best example AI is: 'my wife wanted better lighting in our reno pic thingy' This is healthy and way in the range of normal, not dystopian. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hug 10 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I assume the comment I am responding to was made in sarcasm, so I'm basing my response on that register, so apologies in advance if I have got this wrong. I don't understand what is dystopian about this: With the exception of mildly elevated resource consumption to achieve the end goal (a nicer photo), is this not the sort of things that humans have been wanting and doing for as long as photographs have been a thing? It was previously mostly unachievable for regular people to have their snapshots processed in such a way, but it feels like it's just making what used to be special mildly trivial. Anyone who has had their wedding photographed for the past 20 years has had the photos touched up on the way through. Any school portrait for just as long. 100 years ago people would dodge and burn photographic prints to improve them as much as the technology allowed. This is just the forward evolution of that old tale. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||