| ▲ | TomGarden 3 hours ago | |
Yeah agree. Someone on HN posed the theory that the dogfooding might have worked against them here - the theory is that internally they used Fable as conversational agent and Opus as subagents, leading to Opus falling deeper into a style mainly aimed at other LLMs. All conjecture of course, and yeah it's hard to imagine they would enjoy this prose internally | ||
| ▲ | bilalq an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Fable can't write in a legible manner either. | ||