That's not what your Chief Research Officer, Mark Chen, says on X: "Do we use user feedback and de-identified data to improve ChatGPT and Codex in a holistic way? Yes. And so does every LLM company."

https://x.com/markchen90/status/2097400166554993041

▲

sebzim4500 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Can you explain what part of his post you believe is inconsistent with that quote?

▲

mucha 3 hours ago | parent [-]

"If they opted out of training, then we definitely did not train on them."

Per OpenAI's privacy policy, they use de-identified data to improve their products. From Mark Chen's comment, improving products includes improving ChatGPT and Codex in a holistic way. Improving models in a holistic way sounds a lot like training to me.

▲

derangedHorse 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Per OpenAI's privacy policy, they use de-identified data to improve their products

That’s not inconsistent with what you responded to. They use your data unless you opt out. If the user doesn’t opt out, their de-identified data is used to improve their products.

▲

mucha 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It appears than you can only opt-out from having OpenAI train models on your data. There isn't an option for opting to exclude your de-identified data from being used to improve OpenAI products.

	▲	hellohello2 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Are you certain of this? I would be inclined to believe you but it would be nice to know decisively.

▲

vemacs 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Does OpenAI think de-identified data is no longer user data? Wild take for OpenAI and certainly not industry standard.