| ▲ | saejox a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
make it 4x40 raid-0 ssds to achieve 40 tps. or 40 macbooks with each 4 ssd. to get 40 tps. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | npn a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
yeah raid or not you still get the hard limitation by the pcie lanes it is even worse with 40 macbooks. if 40 macbooks is all that take to serve a 1TB model with decent speed then you would see everyone selling the models for very cheap right now. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Argonautlabs a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Bandwidth doesn't multiply like that here, and we measured it rather than assumed it. A MoE layer needs 16 expert reads and can't proceed until the slowest one lands, so a layer costs the max over its reads, not the sum. Going from one drive to four (13.6 → ~33 GB/s of combined ceilings) took decode from ~52% to 100% of our number — not 4× — with Every drive already at 90–100% of its own ceiling. RAID-0 was one of the first things tried and it lost: striping makes every read touch every drive, so the slowest drive sets every barrier. What moves this is per-read latency and read scheduling, and for long prompts not re-reading each layer's experts eight times. Numbers in results/SCALING.md and results/PREFILL.md. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||