The amount of goalpost moving is insane. "Yeah it can solve Millenium problems, but can it do it with nothing more than a one sentence prompt?"

Also there are proofs where the only human steering was "keep going".

▲

aeve890 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Parent comment is claiming creativity and genius beyond human experts, so why not ask for a fully unassisted AI novel result? Having access to the entire corpus of human knowledge, what else such amazing entity would require to solve a hard problem by its own?

Any result of such kind from an AI alone would be enough to refute my argument, yet you don't present any.

>Also there are proofs where the only human steering was "keep going".

Which ones?

▲

masterspy7 3 hours ago | parent [-]

https://www.anthropic.com/research/riemann-zeta

>Throughout this process, Jarred's input was mostly limited to sending Claude messages of encouragement (mostly variants of “keep going” or “believe in yourself”).2 This seems to have helped Claude overcome some initial skepticism that it could make meaningful progress.

	▲	aeve890 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Do you even know what a proof entails? This shit is not a proof, come on.

▲

sp527 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Well, in fairness, the OP asked for counterpoints. He didn't stipulate that they need to be reasonable.

	▲	aeve890 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If OP claim superhuman genius, then they should prove superhuman genius. Simple as that.