Remix.run Logo
bossyTeacher 5 hours ago

> WhatsApp is end-to-end encrypted,

- Meta data of your messages is not encrypted so meta can make a graph of who you talk to and when

- backups are not encrypted by default so plaintext of your private chats can be obtained

- even if you enable encryption for backups all it takes is for the other person in your private convo (or a person in a group chat) to not enable it for your messages to be available in plaintext

netsharc 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I've read that if you give FB/IG/WA access to all files/photos, and you have GPS metadata for photos (I do, hey it's useful to know where I took a pic), it can trawl that data to see where you've been and when...

So now Android strips location info when sharing an image to an app. A filter layer between filesystem and app, to add complexity to the whole system...

lxgr 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> - backups are not encrypted by default so plaintext of your private chats can be obtained

Yes, but importantly not by Meta themselves.

> - Meta data of your messages is not encrypted so meta can make a graph of who you talk to and when

Fair enough and worth mentioning. I'm personally fine with it.

> - even if you enable encryption for backups all it takes is for the other person in your private convo (or a person in a group chat) to not enable it for your messages to be available in plaintext

Yes, but how would you prevent that even in principle? I can't control what the people I'm messaging do with their copy of my messages. As long as there isn't unnecessary non-repudiation (e.g. by the sender cryptographically signing all outbound messages, which the Signal protocol intentionally avoids), I think this is fair as well.

I do agree that e.g. vanishing chats with a short timeout/"view only once" images should probably not be included in backups, though; last time I checked, I think they were.

cobbzilla 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> Yes, but importantly not by Meta themselves.

Don’t they save backups to Meta? Even if not, they can read whatever’s (unencrypted) on your phone if they really want to.

lxgr 3 hours ago | parent [-]

They currently go on iCloud on iOS and Google Drive on Android. There are rumors about a first-party backup service, which would obviously change that calculus, but nothing concrete yet.

addandsubtract 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

WhatsApp / Meta is also on both sides of the E2EE.

lxgr 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Sure, but so is every security researcher in the world if they want to be, and they only need to get caught shipping exfiltration logic once.

bossyTeacher 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> so is every security researcher in the world if they want to be

Most security researchers lack Meta's history:

- Testing emotional manipulation features on thousands of users non-consensually

- Adding spyware on underage users

- Intercept a rival app's traffic

- Allowing harm to teen mental health

And most importantly, most security researchers lack the money and power to fend off the legal consequences of these acts.