| ▲ | olalonde 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Playing the devil's advocate here but it's true that OpenAI didn't have to make those offers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 20k 7 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
They kind of did though, they were hoping to keep the fact that they may well have plagiarised these researchers unpublished work quiet. They did not want this to turn into a scandal about the fact that they appear to be training on prompts without consent It makes a certain amount of sense. The internet data is too polluted with AI usage now to be useful, so the only AI free new data source is the prompts people feed into ChatGPT. The only problem is that its clearly plagiarism Edit: OpenAI have admitted to training on prompts at the time the breakthrough was made: https://mastodon.social/@tristanbuckmaster/11723647135247030... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||