| ▲ | armchairhacker 7 hours ago |
| Let's wait until AI solves a longstanding practical problem before "dawn of the singularity" (which could be tomorrow, but still). |
|
| ▲ | reducesuffering 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Practical?! The goalposts will keep moving until morale improves (narrator: it doesn't) |
| |
| ▲ | armchairhacker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The goalposts for the singularity have always been that AI improves itself fully autonomously. AFAIK OpenAI is heavily using AI but still employs human researchers and developers. | |
| ▲ | qlte 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Uh I'm pretty sure the "singularity" always presupposed a lot of previously unthinkable technologies becoming part of daily life, and was not ever limited to just computer stuff or math problems. "Moving the goalposts" as shallow dismissal doesn't work if e.g. someone points out AI hasn't even built a new type of spaceship yet in response to a claim that AI is on the verge of building a Dyson sphere. |
|
|
| ▲ | bibimsz 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| feels like moving the goalpost. is the achievement impressive or isn't it? |
| |
| ▲ | qlte 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The question being posed isn't whether AI is impressive but whether we're at the "dawn of the singularity" | | |
| ▲ | bibimsz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | i'm observing that rapidly moving goalposts is a feature of the singularity |
|
|