| ▲ | surgical_fire an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Market reward is the best proxy for good we have. Only if the goal is profit. All else be damned. > What's your alternative? Executive fiat? Mob rule? It is always bewildering to me that people see the world being raped by corporations and their negative externality, and they think that this is the pinnacle that humanity can achieve. Nothing else can be better, if all your options are "mob rule" or "executive fiat". I fancy myself a misanthrope, but damn, next to people in this forum I am probably the last humanist walking through the ruins of civilization. > Deepmind is objectively good. Google is objectively bad, and the world would be a much nicer place if they ceased to exist. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> It is always bewildering to me that people see the world being raped by corporations and their negative externality, and they think that this is the pinnacle that humanity can achieve. > I fancy myself a misanthrope, but damn, next to people in this forum I am probably the last humanist walking through the ruins of civilization. A humanist who uses a term of sexual violence so cavalierly? If you are in the United States and you want a good civic lesson in state power, you should go to your nearest metropolitan criminal court. Maybe you will have a more accurate view of what government means then. At the very least, you will likely learn to banish such a casual invocation of that word from your lexicon. > Nothing else can be better, if all your options are "mob rule" or "executive fiat". What we have now is the middle ground between king and mob. It took centuries and much carnage to achieve. Does the famous Churchill quote really need to keep being repeated? Do you have an alternative proposal? Or maybe you have a sensible proposal that falls within the established democratic bounds? Or perhaps instead by "would be a much nicer place if they ceased to exist" we should simply infer a generalized whining rather than any specific policy prescription? What's your actual idea, do you have one? Maybe if you endeavored to communicate without self-satisfied hyperbole you would find we actually have reason to agree with each other. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rightnutwingjob an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Only if the goal is profit. All else be damned. And yet, in order to generate profit an organisation must convince people to buy their products and services at a price high enough that to cover costs and more This means the products and services must be good, unless you think people who buy products and services are fucking idiots. > I fancy myself a misanthrope Oh, I see. Not only do you think people are fucking idiots, you also believe the they should be put to death. It is, after all, the only way to “save the planet” from The Evil People and their “Corporations”. Grow the fuck up. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||