| ▲ | p0lychromatic an hour ago | |
Yet here we are, in this thread, discussing why LG is spying on us. While some stuff are legit issues such as ADR, people now think they are wire-tapping. Because somebody used a rooted device to show-case recording silently through their device. Can you blame corporations having this control-freak nature when shit like this happens? It's stuff like this that likely pushes corporations now to invest more into device security, and locking down their stuff more. Good for security and the corporation. Maybe mid-term good for you consumer, because they might get more cautious with tracking stuff. But long-term bad for you consumer, too, because they will make sure to lock down their devices better. | ||
| ▲ | rcxdude 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
The solution to misleading reports about your software isn't more opacity, though, quite the opposite. If they were transparent about what they were doing then there would be much less room for speculation and misleading reports. (And yeah, as pointed out by another comment, if you officially allow users full control of their devices, you are less likely to have people sitting on undisclosed exploits so that they can get it without your help, and as a bonus you have an easier argument for why you are not liable for what someone does with that control) | ||
| ▲ | mort96 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The best solution is obviously sanctioned rooting so that vulnerabilities can be freely shared with manufacturers and fixed. But that's not going to happen. | ||
| ▲ | croon 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> While some stuff are legit issues such as ADR, people now think they are wire-tapping. Because somebody used a rooted device to show-case recording silently through their device. > Can you blame corporations having this control-freak nature when shit like this happens? Is "shit like this" referring to the corporation spying on the user, or the user discovering it? Because one happened before the other, and so impossibly could have caused the former. > It's stuff like this that likely pushes corporations now to invest more into device security, and locking down their stuff more. Or they could just sell the device users want, and not sell their users. | ||