Coincidentally I was trying this out yesterday as a potential option for automated porn filtering for the imageboard that I administrate. It is very lightweight which is good but the performance is not great. Some weird false positives and it does a bad job with flat chested women which is very concerning to me because it leads me to think it won’t be effective against CSAM.

▲

RobotToaster an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Weird, with it being from the UAE I'd expect it to detect any woman with an exposed ankle as porn.

▲

gumby 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Have you been to the UAE? Sure t the beach there re women in burkinis and more, but also women in two piece bikinis.

	▲	wolvoleo 11 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		There's a big difference between international jersetters partying in Dubai and locals. The jersetters are basically exempted from the strict laws because they bring in money. Alcohol is illegal there, homosexuality is, even unmarried sex is. I certainly will never visit there even if they choose not to apply those laws to me as a visitor.

▲

figmert 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

What a strange Islamophobic comment to make. You should probably go out a little more.

▲

instagraham an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

it is amusing that a model from a country that has banned porn would ever be developed. Wouldn't there be hurdles for them to access "data" at every stage?

(I know they must have used a VPN for training but it does seem like an added hoop. OFC the UAE's block is also not particularly thorough.)

You'd assume such models would do better in a laissez-faire nsfw environment than in a walled garden of relatively-less sin.

	▲	dfish 42 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's for research purposes :wink: :wink:
	▲	sillyfluke 41 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It's a story as old as time so I'm frankly less amused by it. The old school censors always saw every "data" that was taboo under the sun prior to censoring it for public consumption.