| ▲ | dylan604 a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
> I hope some day we’ll take this as seriously as environmental protection. Which granted isn’t perfect either, but a lot more than we do about all the mental toxicity being spewed at scale by large tech firms. The problem is that, as we are currently seeing, that any administration can reverse any policy previously set. So any regulation is not a permanent solution. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | CodeMage a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> The problem is that, as we are currently seeing, that any administration can reverse any policy previously set. So any regulation is not a permanent solution. Depends on what you mean by "can". You're right in that any administration that successfully abandons the rule of law can do anything they want, but that's not a problem inherent to regulation as a concept. Regulation is a good solution, but it won't work when a corrupt, lawless regime is in power. It's kinda like saying we shouldn't vaccinate because being forced to drink toilet water can kill us. As for not being a permanent solution, that's okay. No regulation is meant to be permanent. Regulations are supposed to change, but there's supposed to be a process to follow and that process is supposed to ensure that the change happens for the good of the society and is governed by the will of the people. The fact that none of those prerequisites are currently satisfied does not imply that regulation doesn't work. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||