| ▲ | kolinko 6 hours ago |
| Depends on jurisdiction, just because someone wrote something in a contract doesn’t mean it’s binding. In Poland/EU we have an (ever growing) list of forbidden clauses that even when written and signed by consumer are null and void. And I think these can be enacted retroactively - when corporations invent new shady clauses, government steps in and tells them these are invalid. This helps to even out the consumer-corporation field. |
|
| ▲ | hvb2 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > we have an (ever growing) list of forbidden clauses that even when written and signed by consumer are null and void I'm pretty sure that's true almost everywhere. Law beats contract. The real question is how strong the laws are. In the US not so much because of small government and stuff, especially in red states. |
| |
| ▲ | washelterskelte 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The law matters very little when enforcing it in court often means a multiyear lawsuit against an opponent which employs an army of attorneys, has effectively unlimited amounts of money, will likely cost you ruinious sums of money, and for an outcome that's far from guaranteed. | | |
| ▲ | nobody9999 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | >The law matters very little when enforcing it in court often means a multiyear lawsuit against an opponent which employs an army of attorneys, has effectively unlimited amounts of money, will likely cost you ruinious sums of money, and for an outcome that's far from guaranteed. Or when you can't even enforce anything in court as you've already given up your right to spend all your money suing, as binding arbitration is the required and only mechanism to "resolve disputes." To make it extra fair, the corporation pays the arbitration firm for their "objective" decisions and not you. What could go wrong? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hatefulheart 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That’s great! Because then you’re left with the simple task of raising it up with the government. |
| |
| ▲ | layer8 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s actually the judiciary you’d bring it up with, I believe. | | |
| ▲ | soraminazuki 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The judiciary is a branch of government. But more crucially, some countries have better consumer protection agencies, eliminating the need for people to go through costly court battles for common sense stuff. |
|
|