| ▲ | CJefferson 7 hours ago | |
Wow, that is widely disingenuous, I don't really think there is any excuse for that, I don't believe someone deep in compression algorithms wouldn't know they could adjust the block size, and 512GB is a huge block size for bzip3, as it needs to basically all be in memory so you can't pretend that's just 'the standard value'. | ||
| ▲ | ot 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> 512GB is a huge block size for bzip3 Sorry! That was a typo, it should have been 512MB (now fixed). Still huge. | ||
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||