Remix.run Logo
s_dev 4 hours ago

You mean marketing and engineering.

TheOtherHobbes 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Management and engineering.

runsfromfire 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Owners and employees

sam_lowry_ 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Capitalists and workers?

jodrellblank 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Worker and parasite?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=z2_dhUv_CrI (The Simpsons)

philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Capitalists are the ones who allocate - and risk - money to attempt to solve problems like this.

tclancy 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah and we wish they would stop. Because solutions like this are something the system optimizes for.

philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Then we wouldn't have anything that's hard to create and/or requires risk.

jodrellblank an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Imagine claiming undue credit for the works of Euler, Einstein, Michaelangelo, and hundreds of huge Cathedrals all over Europe, while disclaiming the constant bailouts from the taxpayer so that Capitalists never actually risk or lose money, and being blinkered to the fact that 'money' doesn't solve hard problems or do hard things, workers do.

Manhattan project? Taxpayer funded. Concorde? Taxpayer funded. Walking on the Moon? Taxpayer funded. What are you talking about.

philipallstar 22 minutes ago | parent [-]

> so that Capitalists never actually risk or lose money

If you think capitalists never lose money then you're not on this planet. Obviously money is lost all the time. There are lots of investors, lots of companies, and few winners. This is mad. Of course bailouts happen, and they're done by the state. Capitalism would let them fail.

> Manhattan project? Taxpayer funded. Concorde? Taxpayer funded. Walking on the Moon? Taxpayer funded. What are you talking about.

In this case the state is the capitalist, although it's taking the money by force rather than with a risk/reward voluntary investment. The worker isn't doing this by him/herself.

jackb4040 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Bro it's a thread about Theranos just take the L

NoboruWataya an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

She had a science/engineering background, more than marketing. Engineers can be frauds too.

qsera an hour ago | parent [-]

Marketing by definition is fraudulent because it is all about creating a fake need.