My policy is that if someone doesn't understand the tool they've vibe-coded well enough to make the documentation coherent, they don't actually use it, and so I probably shouldn't use it either.

That doesn't really track, though. Even tiny models, like Gemma 4, have coherent prose. I know Opus isn't being quantized that small. It seems like it must be some kind of...I dunno. Maybe over-fitting toward some user metric that doesn't track how readable its writing is?

It seems to still be good at code (though I haven't directly compared to earlier Opus versions lately), so it's not a general model collapse type problem, nor quantization errors. If quantization problems, I would expect it to break down on logic before prose, since a 4-bit quantized Gemma 4, even the small versions, have pretty good and, more importantly, coherent written English.