> I like to think of training and improving AIs as bringing freedom to the world.

Yes, when I think of OpenAI and Anthrophic and Google and Meta and any AI labs and their intentions, i cry a single tear for how these great instituitions are working so hard to bring freedom for humanity.

▲

Walf 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Freedom is slavery!

AI owned by a few companies is more likely to put the majority right back to serfdom. You're a privileged fool to believe that freedom is the likely outcome of the current stampede.

With a username that appears to cheer for a sociopath¹, I doubt reason will convince you.

¹ https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sources-sam-alt...

▲

Barbing 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Their /s was implied

(Like, Meta’s intentions? lol)

	▲	Walf 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I hope so.

▲

altmanaltman an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

It was obviously a sarcastic joke. I get it if you didn't catch that, but do you think my username glorifies Sam Altman? And is that a reason to talk negatively about me? You doubt reason will convince me? And at the end, you call *me* a privileged fool. Wow, just wow.

I hope you don't consider NWA a racial hate group given their name.

Also, I don't think you can cite a subjective take as objectively correct by including it as a footnote. Why do you need to medically diagnose him to say what he's doing is fucked up?

Why does he have to be literally the devil for outrage to work?

He could also not be a sociopath, but still his actions will be his actions, and it is okay to criticize them. Next what, you're going to link to an article that says Sam Altman is also a homosexual, and we must be morally outraged at that next? Because that is where your direction is going, instead of arguing about the ill effects of AI.