Remix.run Logo
everyone 3 days ago

Imo tech companies want people to be as tech-illiterate as possible. Tech illiterate people will not realise how the tech company did extra work to make their product less capable and less empowering to the user in favour of being more beneficial and empowering to the tech company itself.

Obfuscating the file system has been a popular move in this regard. A file system is so elegant and empowering and useful for so many tasks, of course they want to hide it.

kdidjsidjejd 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

You greybeard wannabes all have a serious problem: you think tech is made for you and for you alone.

Once computers became accessible beyond the hobbyist, enthusiast or professional it became a necessity to guarantee that those people that click on anything they are told to click cannot break their computers simply working the file explorar app.

It’s not a bug. It’s a feature.

You can still do whatever you want with your file system. Except that if you want to break into it and mess with it, you have to actually know what you are doing.

bigstrat2003 2 days ago | parent [-]

People who were not hobbyists learned to use computers, in large numbers, so I don't think your conclusion is accurate. Anyone can learn this stuff with a bare minimum of effort.

mitxela 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Computers don't have to have file systems. The history of personal computing has had more time with file systems being hidden, than with them being visible, and if you weight by the number of users, over 90%.

userbinator 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

A file system, especially a local one, invites interoperability and control over one's data. Hiding this from users makes it more difficult for them to have that control, and now they have to rely on the application vendor to do in a proprietary way, what would otherwise be a simple file operation.