| ▲ | izacus 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> I don’t think many people realize how easily Apple could have locked down the laptop to be able to not run any alternate OS at all and the number of lost sales would be so negligibly small as to not matter. They chose to leave it open. Oh please - Apple provided a full suite of Bootcamp drivers for their hardware just a couple of years ago, not locking you out is not a big heroic move you're trying to picture here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | GeekyBear an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In the beginning, Bootcamp had a real job. It allowed a machine running Intel's EFI firmware (as Intel Macs have always done) to boot an OS that only understood the older BIOS standard. Once Microsoft and the various PC vendors started supporting UEFI directly, Bootcamp was just a bundle of existing Windows drivers from the component vendors. If you put a specific Broadcom Wi-Fi chip in the Mac, Bootcamp included Broadcom's Windows driver that was best suited for that chip. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | biorach 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> not locking you out is not a big heroic move you're trying to picture here. The person you're replying to didn't say that. Please don't misrepresent and please keep it respectful | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||