|
| ▲ | flohofwoe 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Funny, the same US "free speech absolutists" get upset about "censorship" outside the US (mostly in EU countries) all the time, so it would be completely on point. |
| |
| ▲ | Petersipoi an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at. You seem to be saying the "free speech absolutists" getting upset about censorship in the EU is a bad thing. While, at the same time, saying them not getting upset about this is a bad thing. In criticizing their inconsistencies, you are highlighting and simultaneously missing your own inconsistencies. | | |
| ▲ | rexpop 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is not how accusations of hypocrisy work. I don't have to agree with any particular stance of yours in order to accuse you of hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Arainach 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you believe in civil liberties as rights and ideals, your belief shouldn't stop at borders. |
|
| ▲ | overfeed 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The US free speech advocates had plenty to day about Julian Assange, an Australian stuck in the Ecuadorean embassy all the way across the Atlantic. |
|
| ▲ | kennywinker 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| So free speech absolutists don't care about free speech, just free speech for americans on american soil? Not very absolutist then... |
