> Indeed, Pangram has become important to so many of us that I was thrilled when Pangram Labs co-founder and CEO Max Spero joined us recently on Oxide and Friends.

Is obvious AI-assisted writing better or worse than an obvious PR quid pro quo and/or cross-promotion?

▲

bcantrill 4 hours ago | parent [-]

This is (obviously?) false, but considering how well-capitalized we are at the moment, you do have me wondering what a quid pro quo would be for; perhaps in this fictional universe Pangram has lucked into some of the PCIe clock buffers that we've been scrambling to secure enough of?

▲

CharlesW 3 hours ago | parent [-]

By "quid pro quo" I wasn't suggesting that Pangram's PR people's podcast placement was pay-for-play, just that they traded access for your positioning of their tech and their exec in your content marketing efforts.

That's pretty normal, but the point is that a blog post which is 35% Pangram promotion may not actually be less annoying than the use of AI to help write blog posts.

▲

mplanchard 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is less annoying, at least to me. I can read a semi-promotional post. I just bounce right off LLM writing

▲

bcantrill 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, fair -- and definitely not: I am earnestly just a fan of what they built (and I also think it's really important as a way of getting a check against rampant LLM use).

	▲	CharlesW 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Your love shines through! I'll work on turning down my "assume the worst" knob, thank you.