| ▲ | Aboutplants 11 hours ago |
| I’m sure there are really unique and great ways to utilize AI in the educational setting, however, young children should not be the Guinea pigs. Prove that certain things are beneficial, not just think they are, and then implement with oversight. People need to stop overthinking everything and just take one step at a time, evaluate and then take another step. |
|
| ▲ | alpinisme 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > People need to stop overthinking everything If anything, it sounds like (you think that) they need to be more thoughtful and not just throw every new technology and technique at the kids and see if it works. I’m not trying to nitpick, but slow down, think, and measure before acting seems like clearer advice. Really what you are fighting is assuming that new technology is useful and just trying out various ad hoc ways to discover how to realize that usefulness. |
| |
| ▲ | tcbawo 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Who is the authoritative voice of reason for the effectiveness of any educational approach or tool? It takes years to sort things out and by then the approach of the day has moved on. Education is an area where everybody feels like they are an expert. In the US, we can't agree on the simplest things impacting our children. | | |
| ▲ | estearum 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It takes years to sort things out and by then the approach of the day has moved on. What? Good approaches, definitionally, have quite a lot of staying power. This is true in most fields but especially in education where, it turns out, we don't really figure out net new approaches that are much better than the last ones very frequently. | | |
| ▲ | tcbawo 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | New approaches are tried in education all the time. What constitutes "good" is subjective and might take years to really play out. Education is like economics... so many variables and changing starting conditions |
| |
| ▲ | shimman 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Clearly it should, at least, never be the company that stands to profit from selling said technology to the government. Like you I am highly skeptical, the idea of classrooms is an idea that is over 5,000 years old. It's kinda been nearly perfected at this point where pedagogy mostly points toward self-sufficiency as soon as possible. Also think it's extremely unethical to experiment on school children using tools or methods that can be detrimental to their development (see chromebook debacle, moving away from phonics). We kinda know what works very well in a public education setting, the constant experimentation does not help. Experiment on adults that can consent, not children. |
| |
| ▲ | amelius 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "overthinking" was the wrong word, clearly, yes. |
|
|
| ▲ | dfxm12 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That gets in the way of making money though. |
