> Is there any evidence …

This is frustrating.

At some point you have to admit you’re in denial.

Or do some research yourself and at least post evidence that you think requires a higher amount of PFAS than you believe is reasonable.

Imagine making the same argument about lead. Leaded gasoline was suspected environmental toxin since like the 1920’s (!!). The EPA now says there is no safe minimum level of lead in the blood. Am I going to hear the same argument there?

// rant …

Chemical is known to be an endocrine disruptor. Maybe endocrine isn’t that important.

Chemical is known to cause birth defects. Maybe the levels used in the study are higher than observed in nature.

Chemical is proven to spread everywhere in the food chain. Maybe it’s inert. Well maybe at that level of concentration it’s harmless. Well maybe humans will adapt to its presence.

It’s like talking to someone who thinks the Grand Canyon was formed over 40 days and nights of the Great Flood. No matter what argument you present, it’s not good enough. There’s always a loophole. Maybe rocks used to be softer so they would erode faster, blah blah blah.