| ▲ | peter_d_sherman 2 hours ago | |||||||
>"But this year’s winning team didn’t go the robot route; instead, they adapted a female mosquito proboscis to work as a nozzle in a super-precise 3D printer. [...] The team called the device a “3D necroprinter.” The necroprinter achieved a resolution ranging from 18 to 22 microns, which was two times smaller than the printers using the smallest commercially available metal dispensing tips." Strangely, this idea has at least a small amount of merit... The idea that an organic, carbon-based structure (in the above case, a mosquito proboscis -- but it could have been a separate, non-living individually 3D printed from organic materials, organic part) would make a good 3D print head with exceedingly fine resolution, is not a terrible idea! (Note that for the record, I do not endorse killing mosquitos, or any other insect to make 3D print heads, or really, anything else!) | ||||||||
| ▲ | OneDeuxTriSeiGo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
FWIW IgNoble award winners aren't inherently bad projects. Some are bad research but the winners tend to be projects that just sound weird or stupid but have legitimately research value. | ||||||||
| ||||||||