Remix.run Logo
billfor 4 hours ago

The "interview" format is a bit difficult to read.

Assuming they did keep it a secret, we had so many other hazards that were (and still are) in common use: lead, mercury, tobacco, chlordane, asbestos, etc... So even if true; even if you accept this as some conspiracy, it would seem to pale in comparison to the list I just gave. We seemingly survived and thrived with with substances far worse than a little plastic running around in our bloodstream, yet this remains the topic of the day and it makes me wonder how real the outrage is (proportionate to other hazards) or if this is just liberal minded "see the big companies are out to get us and this is just the current example". It would be far more persuasive imho to just argue the later point independently, because the plastic (using the term loosely) topic comes up so frequently that to some of us it is just repetitive and not really constructive.

Alwayshasbeeb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>or if this is just liberal minded "see the big companies are out to get us and this is just the current example".

Of course, as opposed to the objective minded "there is no conspiracy ever, when it is repeatedly demonstrated that corporations will poison, experiment on and destroy human lives if it favors their bottom line and they think they can get away with it, this is not to be interpreted as a pattern or structural issue, it's just coincidences and 'bad' individual actors all the way down".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-07-31/pfizer-pays-us75m-ove...

https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/No_More_Bhopals_Env...

https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o681

adjejmxbdjdn 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The commenter you replied to literally provided a list of items that are known to be extremely hazardous.

Their questioning whether the outage surrounding a specific hazard is proportionate to its known danger does not mean they believe no hazards exist.

actionfromafar 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Obviously the big companies look after us.