| ▲ | greyface- an hour ago | |
Why would they serve a secret subpoena and gag order, when instead they can just drive to a secluded location 5km away from the super secure datacenter, dig a few meters down, passively tap a strand or two, facility and service operators none the wiser? | ||
| ▲ | radicaldreamer 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
They’ve already done both. When they can get a cooperative party (AT&T, for example), they colocate their splitter equipment. When they can’t, they tap undersea and overland cables. When it’s a hostile environment entirely, they hack and do secret operations and bribe. | ||
| ▲ | mrtesthah 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The data would/should be encrypted; while the NSA did successfully tap Google's inter-datacenter traffic before the Snowden leaks, since then it is encrypted, too. Hopefully other providers won't fall for that trick anymore, either. | ||