| ▲ | krupan 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open source does not apply to AI and we should discourage anyone from using that term. All the models are opaque and proprietary. You cannot go into any source code and fix bugs, or add features, or study it to learn more. It's not the same thing at all as open source software. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | PhilippGille 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Open source does not apply to AI Isn't that a bit overgeneralized? There's more than weights for the Olmo models for example: https://allenai.org/olmo Similar for Nvidia's Nemotron models IIRC. Artificial Analysis has an "openness" ranking: [1] [1] https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?model-filters=open-sour... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hashstring 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
True, openweight is the correct term. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ms_menardi 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
however, you can test the model, by asking it things. What are you concerned is hiding inside of that big block of numbers? Order 66? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||