| ▲ | enriquto an hour ago | |
but i don't understand... isn't Wiles's proof and its numerous rewritings already in the training set? | ||
| ▲ | ngruhn 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yes. The point was not coming up with the proof from scratch. The point was writing it all down in Lean to make it fully machine checkable. | ||
| ▲ | 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | QuesnayJr an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Of course it is. The interesting thing is that it was able to produce a Lean proof in 11 days, when there's been an ongoing project for several years to do the same thing (though a somewhat different proof) that is nowhere near done. | ||