I think the crowd will split into those who just cared about it being rust and those who wanted some kind of leverage to tempt others into doing something. The former crowd will cease being, while the latter looks for something new to push.

I believe that one does not need to be overly concerned here. As with most things you will never satisfy zealots so it is sufficient to reconsider every once in a while when the status quo changed enough to warrant the effort (i.e. the actual arguments change).

It is always a choice to participate in these "culture wars" or whatever you want to call this. If you can stick to a decision you can limit the impact quite a bit, I've come to realize.

Because it became a meme virtually everyone who says this are actually joking and not serious.

They'll move on to whatever the next meme is.

You will always have someone say "you should rewrite it in x", but it's rare that something carves out so much ground on the Pareto front you'll get a crowd.

I'd argue for moonbit -- faster compile times, almost as fast, smaller wasm artifacts and like lean can have proof of correctness built in.

I think once you have it in Rust the next ask is using no "unsafe" code from that crowd.

Maybe they’ll go back to “year of the Linux desktop”