AI can do things it wasn't trained on and has intuition, given the mathematic proofs frontier models have created.

Claiming that AI can only reproduce a subset of its training data is 2022-level and a tired, outdated claim.

What I meant was it can only work using the data it only has to either combine them to achieve something or use that data in a better way that humans mostly cannot , those mathematical proofs it gave has nothing to do with it , it only proved it using tiny things humans overlooked. It can't create an entire new concept by itself or it has no intuition it only mimics intuition (as far as I can tell) At least not till now. Edit: (I'm only a student I know the line between intuition and proof finding in clever ways is thin, I'm mostly being biased here because it feels absurd to me. On second thought maybe i am wrong.)