| ▲ | anon48293 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It didn’t read AI generated to me. I also love the irony of then using AI to generate a summary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hyperpape 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> This article is the story of chasing that number down to a single machine instruction, and then finding out that the instruction was only half of the answer. > So the difference has to be in what the JIT generated, and the profiler gives us exactly that. > That is the whole vocabulary. Let’s read some code. > Decoding the x86 version instruction by instruction is out of scope here. > What is not architecture specific is the logic. Here’s a segment flagged by Pangram: https://www.pangram.com/history/87e25169-30a4-4030-a65a-dba8... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||