>Closed source doesn't mean not trustworthy

Yes, it does.

>O&O has been making tools like these for a long time.

Microsoft has made Windows for a long time. Longer, even.

SV_BubbleTime 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

The “million eyes” argument has massive exceptions, among the top of my head is OpenSSL’s HeartBleed, a critical and extremely popular security suite that had a simple overflow issue for a decade or longer.

People don’t read the source. And chief among them, statistically, is you.

Open Source is ideal but not a deal breaker.

	▲	Toynbeeidea 38 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		True. And yet the possibility exists that one COULD. That's the difference.