Here's the raw data they provided loaded into SQLite with a client side UI for querying it (loads ~80MB of content) and some GPT-5.6-Sol-generated example queries: https://lite.datasette.io/?url=https://static.simonwillison....

Raw database download (68MB): https://static.simonwillison.net/static/cors-allow/2026/coll...

▲

CringeHNAds 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Cringe

▲

123ahg 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why do you amplify this? Do you have any proof that any of this is real as opposed to Claude generated?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49564222

▲

simonw an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It seems credible to me. There's a chance it's fake, but the idea that OpenAI agents might exploit a wiki that accepts edits via GET doesn't seem unrealistic given what happened with the Hugging Face incident.

▲

seszett an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The edit are there on these wikis (and others not mentioned on the post, but for example on wiki4d, the dlang wiki).

It's very difficult to argue for any fabrication meant to harm OpenAI when the traces are all over the internet if you look for them.

▲

qajsh an hour ago | parent [-]

A fabrication would help OpenAI because its shows the sophistication of GPT-6 one day after its release.

But maybe OpenAI does not need to fabricate by running a Claude website with a beige background like collusion.wiki. It knows it will get away with real spamming.

	▲	Maxious an hour ago \| parent [-]
		You can also go directly to the wikis and look them up in archive.org etc. Would be a very legally risky ARG to deface websites