| ▲ | boshomi 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not really. Nuclear power requires massive subsidies. In Germany, the "De Height" wind farm was completed in August. Sixty-four 15-MW turbines generate about 4 TWh of electricity annually, which is sold entirely on the open market without any EEG funding. The market for baseload electricity has disappeared in Germany, as renewables push the residual load to zero or below for almost the entire year: https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?c=DE&l... The base load is an imaginary line passing through the troughs of the residual load curve. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | djantje 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, but then when the wind doesn't blow, you miss upto 960MW of capacity, you can choose how to fill that; solar, coal, gas, waterpower, diesel, nuclear. And the question is, are those wind turbines without subsidy? Here in the Netherlands some big energy users like Aldel already have stopped, those big users are also good in up and down scaling energy usage on demand, and also those products have to come from somewhere else now, so in the end the question is about energy and availability. Some (or a lot of) subsidies can be justified. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | leonidasrup 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||||||||